The deterioration of American health is no longer subtle. Chronic disease continues to rise, metabolic dysfunction has reached unprecedented levels, autoimmune disorders are increasing in frequency, and younger populations are developing conditions once limited to older adults. Are the current dietary guidelines wrong? Probably, but we have to have a nuanced conversation to discover why.

These patterns are emerging despite strict national adherence to dietary guidelines that emphasize grains, legumes, vegetables, and plant-based sources of fiber. Unfortunately, when individuals seek advice, they often have to ask those who have not fully engaged with the topic. However, the truth is that if these recommendations were aligned with human physiology, national health outcomes should improve. Yet, they have not improved, and in many cases, they have worsened.

At the very least, this discrepancy should motivate critical analysis rather than continued reliance on assumptions. Something is clearly off. One area that receives little honest attention is the biological impact of antinutrients, which are compounds that interfere with digestion, immune regulation, barrier integrity, and mineral absorption. Although their existence is acknowledged in biochemical and agricultural literature, their clinical relevance is often minimized or reframed as unimportant for human health. This likely stems from the fact that most physicians spend roughly two weeks on nutrition training. It is likely underappreciated due to a lack of exposure.

This article examines whether antinutrient-induced inflammation and nutrient disruption may contribute to, or even drive, long-term disease susceptibility, including metabolic disorders, autoimmune conditions, and possibly cancer. Of course, the intent is not to claim certainty but to explore a mechanistic argument that current dietary assumptions may be misaligned with human biology. This is a critical conversation to have, because when viewed through the lens of epigenetics, gut physiology, and immune signaling, a very specific pattern emerges that suggests the human diet should more closely resemble the framework outlined in Nature’s Intent and the findings of the 1984 Aboriginal Diet Study, rather than the modern plant-centered model.

Epigenetics, Dietary Stress, and the Shaping of Disease Trajectories

Epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone alteration are influenced by environmental stressors, including diet. These modifications can be long-lasting and can increase susceptibility to disease. Waterland and Michels (2007) demonstrated that early nutritional environments can induce durable changes in gene expression, which shape health outcomes across the lifespan. Their work supports the developmental origins hypothesis, which argues that disease risk is programmed early and is strongly influenced by nutrient availability and inflammatory conditions.

Liu et al. (2013) showed that epigenetic markers mediate inflammatory risk in rheumatoid arthritis, indicating that immune dysfunction is partly shaped by environmental exposures rather than genetics alone. If antinutrients chronically disrupt barrier integrity, generate inflammation, and limit access to critical minerals, then they create a persistent biological stress that can influence epigenetic programming. This suggests that disease prevalence today may reflect not only immediate dietary choices but also the accumulated epigenetic effects of dietary mismatches over generations.

Epigenetics offers a plausible explanation for why disease trends escalate, even when individuals attempt to follow recommended diets. Chronic exposure to inflammatory compounds and nutrient-blocking substances may shape physiological vulnerability, leaving populations less resilient to disease. We should all take note here.

Mechanisms of Antinutrient-Induced Inflammation

It is somewhat surprising that what I am trying to convey here could be perceived as controversial. The biological effects of antinutrients are well documented across multiple scientific disciplines. Although these mechanisms are well understood, they are often excluded from mainstream nutrition discussions, possibly to avoid conflict with prevailing dietary ideologies or due to a lack of understanding of the broader context. Either way, when analyzed collectively, they form a consistent pattern of inflammation.

Lectins bind to carbohydrate residues on epithelial surfaces and can disrupt normal glycosylation patterns. This contributes to impaired barrier function and altered immune signaling. Pusztai et al. (1995) demonstrated that dietary lectins alter gut surface glycosylation and impact mucosal integrity. This disruption increases permeability, creating greater exposure to luminal antigens. The resulting immune activation raises baseline inflammatory tone even in the absence of infection.

Oxalates initiate inflammation through crystallization and signaling pathways. Mulay, Evan, and Anders (2014) demonstrated that oxalate crystals activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and induce IL-1β secretion. This is a potent inflammatory stimulus that contributes to systemic immune activation. Soluble oxalates add a secondary layer of stress through mitochondrial disruption and oxidative injury.

Phytates bind essential minerals, including zinc, magnesium, iron, and calcium. Zinc is required for DNA repair, immune regulation, and antioxidant function. Ho (2004) confirmed that zinc deficiency increases DNA damage and increases the risk of cancer. Prasad (2008) documented the role of zinc in controlling inflammatory responses. When phytates sequester minerals, they reduce the cell’s capacity to repair damage and regulate immune activity.

Saponins disrupt cholesterol-containing membranes and impair epithelial stability. Gee et al. (1993) demonstrated that quinoa saponins injure intestinal mucosa and alter membrane function. This damage increases permeability and permits translocation of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Even mild increases in circulating lipopolysaccharide are sufficient to trigger TLR4 signaling and systemic inflammation.

Gluten and other prolamins increase zonulin release, which modulates tight junctions and regulates paracellular permeability. Fasano (2011) showed that dysregulated zonulin signaling contributes to autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. When permeability increases, immunogenic peptides and microbial fragments enter circulation, which further elevates inflammation.

Nightshade glycoalkaloids interfere with mitochondrial stability and cell membrane function. Mensinga et al. (2005) documented gastrointestinal symptoms and systemic effects in humans exposed to ascending doses of glycoalkaloids. These compounds can accumulate over time because clearance requires more than twenty-four hours. The resulting membrane disruption contributes to inflammatory responses.

The evidence is clear that these compounds are biologically active and capable of influencing inflammation, nutrient status, and tissue integrity. The mainstream recommendation is that moderation is key. However, epigenetics would likely argue that the body registers the problem either way. I will argue that we need to think in the long term.

Inflammation, Nutrient Deficiency, and Cancer Risk

Inflammation is a central driver of tumorigenesis. Mantovani et al. (2008) established that chronic inflammation (lasting for a long period of time) promotes cellular proliferation, angiogenesis, and resistance to apoptosis. In other words, chronic inflammation helps damaged cells grow faster, build new blood supply, and avoid dying when they should. Inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress cause DNA damage, and impaired DNA repair increases the likelihood of malignant transformation. This suggests that if antinutrients contribute to persistent inflammation, they indirectly support conditions that favor the development of cancer.

Nutrient deficiencies compound this issue. Zinc and magnesium support antioxidant defense and DNA repair. When phytates sequester these minerals, the cell is left vulnerable to oxidative stress. Ho (2004) demonstrated that zinc deficiency weakens genomic stability. Prasad (2008) demonstrated that zinc deficiency affects immune cell function and increases the inflammatory burden. The combination of increased inflammatory stimuli and decreased repair capacity creates a biologically unfavorable environment.

This dual pathway of damage helps explain why inflammation and nutrient scarcity often coexist in chronic disease. Unfortunately, modern diets may inadvertently promote both conditions. The result should be expected.

A Cascading Interaction Across Systems

Most dietary analyses examine antinutrients independently, which is a mistake because doing so overlooks reality. Real diets combine lectins, oxalates, phytates, saponins, glycoalkaloids, and gluten concurrently. These compounds disrupt different aspects of immune regulation, mineral balance, and epithelial integrity. Their combined effect is not simply the sum of their individual effects. It is a cascade where each mechanism amplifies another.

Damage to the epithelial barrier increases exposure to inflammatory triggers, thereby enhancing the likelihood of inflammation. Nutrient sequestration limits the body’s ability to contain inflammation. Mitochondrial disruption increases oxidative stress. Inflammasome activation intensifies cytokine release. The story goes on. However, the point is that, over time, this pattern alters metabolic homeostasis and immune function. A chronic low-grade inflammatory state emerges, and this inflammatory state is linked to nearly all modern chronic diseases. Cause and effect are real!

This interaction provides a mechanistic explanation for the rise of metabolic syndrome, autoimmune disorders, gastrointestinal diseases, and, most likely, certain cancers in populations consuming diets rich in plant-based foods and antinutrients. Of course, it also aligns with epidemiological trends that demonstrate worsening health outcomes despite increased adherence to recommended dietary guidelines. Yet, few seem to want to pay attention. In fact, it seems that “the system” is doubling down on the terrible advice.

Implications for Dietary Guidance and the Logic of Nature’s Intent

Most people suffer needlessly, and for far too long. The 1984 Aboriginal Diet Study demonstrated that metabolic dysfunction improved rapidly when individuals returned to a traditional diet based on animal products and fruit (O’Dea, 1984). This pattern aligns with my “Nature’s Intent” philosophy, which argues that fruit and animal products form the core of a biologically compatible human diet. These foods are nutrient-dense, non-inflammatory, and low in antinutrients. They support metabolic stability and avoid the inflammatory cascades discussed earlier.

My argument is that if current dietary guidelines were optimal, national health trends would reflect that optimization. They don’t. The consistent decline in health across multiple domains suggests a misalignment between recommended diets and human physiology. It should not be controversial to say that a diet rich in compounds that induce inflammation and impede nutrient absorption may be detrimental to long-term health. Granted, more research is needed, but it is reasonable to draw preliminary conclusions from the biological evidence and observed health outcomes. Dietary ideology and identity should never outweigh biological reality.

Final Thoughts

At the very least, we know that antinutrients cause predictable inflammatory and metabolic disruptions, which are well-documented in the scientific literature. These disruptions include impaired barrier integrity, mineral sequestration, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative damage, and immune activation. This can lead to chronic low-grade inflammation. Chronic inflammation can increase the risk of developing certain types of cancer by causing DNA damage and creating an environment that promotes tumor growth. The rise in disease prevalence in populations following plant-centric dietary models suggests that current recommendations may not align with human biological needs.

Will this be studied in any meaningful way? Likely not. But until there is definitive evidence to the contrary, I would argue that it is highly rational to consider dietary strategies that minimize antinutrients while maximizing nutrient density. We have nothing to lose and everything to gain by doing so.

This is the same diet that our species has followed for thousands of years, centered around animal products and fruits, including foods often mislabeled as vegetables, such as cucumbers, tomatoes, squash, avocados, and so on. This pattern supports cellular stability, reduces inflammatory load, and supplies the nutrients required for long-term health. The same simply cannot be said for the antinutrient-heavy foods promoted today, including processed “dead” foods, grains, legumes, vegetables, and plant-based fiber sources. The clues are visible in mechanistic biology, evolutionary logic, and in the repeated failures of modern dietary guidelines. I think it would be more than reasonable to act accordingly.

Keep Learning: Nature’s Intent: The True Omnivore Diet

Dr. Robertson is a health researcher and educator, not a physician. The information provided here is not medical advice, a professional diagnosis, opinion, treatment, or service to you or any other individual. The information provided is for educational and anecdotal purposes only and is not a substitute for medical or professional care. You should not use this information as a substitute for a visit, call, consultation, or the advice of your physician or other healthcare providers. Dr. Robertson is not liable or responsible for any advice, course of treatment, diagnosis, or additional information, services, or products you obtain or utilize. IF YOU BELIEVE YOU HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY, YOU SHOULD IMMEDIATELY CALL 911 OR YOUR PHYSICIAN.

References

Fasano, A. (2011). Zonulin and its regulation of intestinal barrier function. Physiological Reviews, 91(1), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00003.2008

Gee, J. M., Price, K. R., Ridout, C. L., Wortley, G. M., Hurrell, R. F., & Johnson, I. T. (1993). Saponins of quinoa: Effects of processing and biological impact on intestinal mucosa. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 63(2), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740630208

Ho, E. (2004). Zinc deficiency, DNA damage and cancer risk. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 15(10), 572–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2004.07.003

Liu, Y., Aryee, M. J., Padyukov, L., Fallin, M. D., Hesselberg, E., et al. (2013). Epigenome-wide association data implicate DNA methylation as an intermediary of genetic risk in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature Biotechnology, 31(2), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2487

Mantovani, A., Allavena, P., Sica, A., and Balkwill, F. (2008). Cancer-related inflammation. Nature, 454, 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07205

Mensinga, T. T., Sips, A. J. A. M., Rompelberg, C. J. M., van Twillert, K., Meulenbelt, J., van den Top, H. J., and van Egmond, H. P. (2005). Potato glycoalkaloids and adverse effects in humans: An ascending dose study. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 41(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.09.004

Mulay, S. R., Evan, A., and Anders, H. J. (2014). Oxalate crystals activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and trigger IL-1β secretion. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 29(3), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft510

O’Dea, K. (1984). Marked improvement in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in diabetic Australian Aborigines after temporary reversion to traditional lifestyle. Diabetes, 33(6), 596–603. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.33.6.596

Prasad, A. S. (2008). Zinc in human health, effect of zinc on immune cells. Molecular Medicine, 14(5–6), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.2119/2008-00033.Prasad

Pusztai, A., Ewen, S. W., Grant, G., Peumans, W. J., Van Damme, E. J., Coates, M. E., and Bardocz, S. (1995). Lectins and also bacteria modify the glycosylation of gut surface receptors in the rat. Glycoconjugate Journal, 12(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00731865

Vojdani, A. (2015). Lectins, agglutinins, and their roles in autoimmune reactivities. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 21(Suppl 1), 46–51.

Waterland, R. A., and Michels, K. B. (2007). Epigenetic epidemiology of the developmental origins hypothesis. Annual Review of Nutrition, 27, 363–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093705